Wednesday December 16, 2009 13:11
Nevermind
Album Description
Japanese special edition of this classic original album re-released on CD and packaged in a 12 x 12 inch album sized LP replica sleeve with all the original artwork and tracks. Universal. 2005.Amazon.com
If Nevermind’s sound is familiar now, it’s only because thousands of rock records that followed it were trying very hard to cop its style. It tears out of the speakers like a cannonball, from the punk-turbo-charged riff of “Smells Like Teen Spirit” onward, … More >>
Related posts:
- Nirvana!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!? I have heard a few songs by Nirvana. Smells...
- nirvana – smells like teen spirit nirvana – smells like teen spirit ...
- With The Lights Out Disc 1 1.Heartbreaker [Live] – 2:59 2.Anorexorcist – 2:44...
- Album reviews: In utero, by Nirvana Kurt Cobain was a man full of contradictions that were...
- Metallica’s Death Magnetic is Still Number One! In terms of the rock genre, nothing can really get...
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.
- Category: Nirvana
- (5) Comments


Forest Laundry
December 16th, 2009 at 3:11 pm
I saw a review below that said nirvana “inspired” Pearl Jam… dude, what kind of drugs are you on? nirvana inspired Pearl Jam about as much as Poison inspired Led Zeppelin, kid. maybe you should look around a bit, i read an article on here that explains how pearl jam created nirvana, just get your info straight boy. & that brings me to this review, this album wasnt revolutionary… maybe in the mtv world, but this album could be called a rip-off of ‘Doolittle’ by the Pixies.. when Pearl Jam released ‘Vs’ in 1993, that was truly revolutionary, maybe not commercially, despite it being the fastest selling album ever, but it certainly was revolutionary musically, something nirvana has never done, but took credit for
Rating: 1 / 5
Lourdes Fleckenstein
December 16th, 2009 at 3:48 pm
This album has to be the most overated album ever. there is literaly nothing at all good about this cd. lets see here the vocalist only screams like a woman and complains about his social life. the guitars are terrible kurt only plays 2 cords. count along with me ONE TWO! thats it. the bas is just as disgraceful as the guitars as well. the work on this album is very bad and it suffers from horible production. or is that just the music being that bad? i dont know why everyone adores this album it sucks worse than patriotic songs and smooth jazz. cobain dosent have a voice at all he just screams. now i can appreciate good screaming but the way he screams sounds like the screaming of a woman when she gets preganant!. Not to metion is guitar playing his awful this guy cant play guitar at all. rolling stone listed him at number 12 on there top 100 guitarists. that is a crime because this idiot was ranked below some true guitar masters jimmy page 9. kirk hamett 11. you have to be brain dead or completely oblivious to any form of muscianship to think nirvana are even slightly good. perhaps ive been spoiled by GOOD music. but i just thought this cd was laughable and an insult to good music of any kind. if youre looking for good music might i point you in the direction of these albums instead.
Metalica master of puppets
led zepplin physical grafiti
led zepplin iv
jimi hendrix are you experinced?
bob dylan blood on the tracks
quenn greatest hits
metalica black album
metalica ride the lightning
quenn a night at the opera
Rating: 1 / 5
G. Rao
December 16th, 2009 at 6:10 pm
First of all, Nirvana sucks. They were totally unoriginal and lame. They looked lame, they sounded lame and they were total dorks.
Rock stars should look cool. For those of you that don’t know what this means, it means you should wear tight leather pants, lots of chains and shiny metal objects, and have tattoos on every exposed surface of your skin. Did Nirvana have any of this? No.
Rock stars should sound cool. That means that they should be able to screech long and loud like Axl or Robert Plant. They should play long and fast guitar solos (like Megadeth), and they should sing about how much money they have and how many chicks they bang. At the very least, they should be able to brag about how great they are in song. Did Nirvana do any of these things? No.
Rock stars should be totally original too. Nirvana’s style was basically just cobbled together from bits and pieces of other bands that came before them, unlike true masters of rock like GnR, Megadeth or Metallica. Plus, their songs were simple and easy to play. Everyone knows that unless a song contains multiple key changes, minor chord progressions and syncopation, its total crap. Also, as I mentioned earlier, songs should have lots of guitar solos in them. Lots of them!
So you see, Nirvana was total crap. They sucked. They weren’t even authentically poor. They were probably wealthy. If you listen to Nirvana then you are a total loser. Go buy something else. Go buy some Avril or some Good Charlotte. Better yet, go check out some classics like Van Halen (Sammy Hagar era – I don’t think we have to get into that other dork and his pathetic shtik). Now there’s someone that knows how to take a guitar and make it go “neeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeer-wah-wah-wah-wah-wah-diddly-diddly-doodley-doooooooooo!!!!!”.
Rating: 1 / 5
Anonymous
December 16th, 2009 at 8:23 pm
WELL FOLKS, NEVERMIND SUCKS. METALLICA WERE MUCH BETTER THAN NIRVANA. KURT COBAIN JUST PLAIN SCREAMS ALONG WITH OTHER REALLY AWFUL SINGERS LIKE BON SCOTT, BRIAN JOHNSON, ROBERT PLANT, AND
STEVEN TYLER. MOST OF THE SONGS ON NEVERMIND WERE THE WORST SONGS EVER RECORDED ESPECIALLY TRACK 1 WITH NO GUITAR SOLOS. WHY? THEY DON’T MAKE ANY LOVE SONGS EITHER LIKE DIRE STRAITS AND FOREIGNER. THIS IS NOISE!! DON’T BUY ANY ALBUM FROM NIRVANA, LED ZEPPELIN, AND AC/DC, ALL BANDS SUCK. DIRE STRAITS, FOREIGNER, AND METALLICA ARE THE BEST!!! NIRVANA SUCKS.
Rating: 2 / 5
Yona G Rothwax
December 16th, 2009 at 9:44 pm
This music is just yelling and screaming it’s ridiculuos. and angry and not healthy for human souls. And really really loud, so loud it makes Led Zeppelin seem like Kenny G. Amy Grant, Elton John, Eric Clapton, U2 and Garth Brooks are much more talented than this loud garbage
Rating: 1 / 5